Damaged weapons and armours

[Pyrizzle]

Blacksmith: "Fine, but I'll have to charge a 25 gold nail removal fee".

Can't afford the nail removal either?

**The Blacksmith sticks it into your head** "Remove it yourself."

[sorrow]

*Passes out on blacksmiths floor bleeding from wound*

Blacksmith: no there's a 50 gold napping fee and a 1k gold clean up fee from your blood.

*blacksmith becomes loan shark*

[Pyrizzle]

Aaaaaaanyways.... Let's not venture too far off topic here:

Topic: Weapons that receive wear and tear.

Anybody Pro? Anybody Con? & explain why?

[Mino]

Ok back on topic, I think it would make the game more complicated but not in a good way. For early in the game, it costs a lot just to get a good weapon the first time, much less having to worry about replacing it to get the same effect.

[Pyrizzle]

Ok back on topic, I think it would make the game more complicated but not in a good way. For early in the game, it costs a lot just to get a good weapon the first time, much less having to worry about replacing it to get the same effect.

I agree, It would be a pain in the neck to save up for the weapon you need only to have costly repair bills keep you from buying your next piece of equipment you so desperately need.

Also, later on in the game when money becomes less important it would be easy for players to buy multiple of weapons so they would be able to stay out for longer w/o having to repair their gear.

This suggestion of Equipment wear and tear is a big -1 in my book.

There are more enjoyable ideas that we could use our resources on that this one (which frankly would be more of an annoyance than an upgrade to the game)

[sorrow]

Ok ok ok you all convinced me -1 on this one.
Reason having to start over would be a pain with repair cost and what not.