Page 1 of 2

What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever?

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:47 pm
by XxProtonxX
Mine is certainly this moment. :D :!:

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:02 pm
by Antison

That ×681on Bleeding Wounds couldn't possibly be legit. I'm guessing that you have been playing with the source code.

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:55 am
by XxProtonxX
tek wrote:
That ×681on Bleeding Wounds couldn't possibly be legit. I'm guessing that you have been playing with the source code.
No all it was, was spamming end turn and healing when needed against an izithel guardian :D

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:42 am
by Antison
XxProtonxX wrote:
tek wrote:
That ×681on Bleeding Wounds couldn't possibly be legit. I'm guessing that you have been playing with the source code.
No all it was, was spamming end turn and healing when needed against an izithel guardian :D

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:16 pm
by XxProtonxX
tek wrote:
XxProtonxX wrote:
tek wrote:
That ×681on Bleeding Wounds couldn't possibly be legit. I'm guessing that you have been playing with the source code.
No all it was, was spamming end turn and healing when needed against an izithel guardian :D

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.
I was pressing end turn and then healing when I needed to.
That's how I achieved this result, if that makes more sense.

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:33 pm
by PK17
I thought the max stack of a condition was 6.

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:19 pm
by XxProtonxX
PK17 wrote:I thought the max stack of a condition was 6.
That's what I thought too but it turns out to be different.
Is that a bug or something then. :o :shock:

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:58 pm
by Stompp
XxProtonxX wrote:
PK17 wrote:I thought the max stack of a condition was 6.
That's what I thought too but it turns out to be different.
Is that a bug or something then. :o :shock:
The first time the turn ended, it would have killed you with that many stacks, so it appears to be a display bug if anything...

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:32 pm
by ncer
In the previous version of the game I had something similar too, losing about 60 every turn to poison, I think that was also more than 6 stacks and accomplished the same way. Don't know if it's still possible, they don't seem to hit me often enough anymore.

Re: What was the worst actor condition/active condition ever

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:06 pm
by XxProtonxX
ncer wrote:In the previous version of the game I had something similar too, losing about 60 every turn to poison, I think that was also more than 6 stacks and accomplished the same way. Don't know if it's still possible, they don't seem to hit me often enough anymore.
I really did that to check what would happen if I did this.
I also think that only the rounds should stack and not the inflicted multiplayer.
So if a player with low health gets there and cannot easily kill them does not die from stacked bleeding.