Page 1 of 1
Quick Learner (2) vs Hard Hit what should I choose ?
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:37 pm
by shirish
With QL (2) it basically would make my next level-up slightly faster but with Hard Hit it would make hitting have a bit more value. Both have positives with the downside being using one or the other option makes the other one take more time, although with QL(2) it should be slightly quicker.
Looking forward to what people think.
Re: Quick Learner (2) vs Hard Hit what should I choose ?
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:56 pm
by rijackson741
QL gives you only 5% more XP per kill. So if without QL you just reached level 20, then with QL 1 you would get to level 21 (that's not quite correct, because the number of XP per level changes, but it's close enough for the point I'm trying to make). Similarly, after 40 levels without QL you would be at level 42 with QL, and you if put your two extra level ups into AD, then you would have the same AD as if you had simply taken HH to begin with. It's still not as good though, because QL is not a prerequisite for any higher level skill, whereas HH is.
IMO, QL is underpowered, and not worth it.
Re: Quick Learner (2) vs Hard Hit what should I choose ?
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:16 am
by Duke
yeah, I go HH, because I use cleave, make that LOVE cleave, and hard hit is a pre req for that skill. there is another thread on here someone talking about Quick Learner. some say, if you are going to take it, then you keep taking it.